Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1332/2024

Case between M.Abdul Shukkoor et al vs G.Madhusoodanan regarding appointment of an expert commission.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II
Judge
Smt. Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-01-13
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M.Abdul Shukkoor and N. Chandra Babu are the plaintiffs, while G.Madhusoodanan is the defendant. The case involves a petition to appoint an expert commission to ascertain the age and structural stability of a building.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the application to appoint an expert to ascertain the structural stability of the plaint schedule building but did not approve the expert panel submitted by the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Appointment of an expert from the Public Works Department.
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the application to appoint an expert to ascertain the structural stability of the plaint schedule building but did not approve the expert panel submitted by the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found it necessary to ascertain structural stability, which is a key factor in the injunction application.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Having considered the rival contention of both sides I am satisfied that structural stability in one among the factors to be ascertained in considering the injunction application.

Judgment Evidence:

IA allowed. Pronounced in the open court on this the 13th day of January 2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.Abdul Shukkoor
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
N. Chandra Babu
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
G.Madhusoodanan
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. G.Rajan Potayil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Yamuna Rani.V.G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Gopikrishna.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. R. Reji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Application filed to appoint an expert commission to ascertain the age, structural stability of plaint schedule building.
Evidence:
Hence I am satisfied that it is necessary to appoint an expert to ascertain the structural stability of plaint schedule building.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M.Abdul Shukkoor et al vs G.Madhusoodanan regarding appointment of an expert commission.
Case Code Year
Case between M.Abdul Shukkoor et al vs G.Madhusoodanan regarding appointment of an expert commission.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreedevi vs Mahesh regarding realization of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Application in Pauper Suit Defendant Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between R.Vijayakumar vs Arun Mohan regarding possession of petition schedule building
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ashraf Ali vs Badhusha regarding rent control petition
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won