Case Summary
M A Vincent filed a suit against Krishnan and others. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed due to the absence of the defendants.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as not pressed in the absence of the defendants.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed as not press. All interim orders shall stand vacated.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M A Vincent
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Krishnan
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kishore Krishnan
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Viswambaran @ Viswan
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M A Leo Paul
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shiju Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Manu T M
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sachu Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Counsel for plaintiff filed not press memo. Hence suit is dismissed as not press.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M A Vincent vs Krishnan et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between M A Vincent vs Krishnan et al regarding dismissal of suit