Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1116/2020

Case between M A Mrudulan et al vs Sanmarga Pradeepam Yogam et al regarding refund of Court fee based on mediation agreement.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2026-01-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, M A Mrudulan and others, filed a suit regarding a mediation agreement against the Sanmarga Pradeepam Yogam and its secretary. The court found the mediation terms to be lawful and decreed the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit based on the mediation agreement, which was found to be lawful. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of court fees as per law.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of Court fee as per law.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit based on the mediation agreement, which was found to be lawful. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of court fees as per law.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The mediation report was received as settled and found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The mediation report was received as settled and found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of mediation agreement is found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed based on mediation agreement. Mediation agreement shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M A Mrudulan
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lenin K Das
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K V Abilasash
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Syam K R
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Arun Aravind K
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sanmarga Pradeepam Yogam
Party Age
62
Relation
represented by its Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M K Ramesh Babu
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M K Pushpangathan
Party Age
71
Relation
fathers name not known
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Purushothaman C M
Relation
fathers name not known
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T K Gireeshan
Party Age
71
Relation
fathers name not known
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P Sathisan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Leena Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rajagopalan A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Biju Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sandhya C Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Dharmya M S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Lijin Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed based on mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Hence suit is decreed based on mediation agreement.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled for refund of Court fee as per law.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled for refund of Court fee as per law.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M A Mrudulan et al vs Sanmarga Pradeepam Yogam et al regarding refund of Court fee based on mediation agreement.
Case Code Year
Case between M A Mrudulan et al vs Sanmarga Pradeepam Yogam et al regarding refund of Court fee based on mediation agreement.

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 01/01/2026 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/21/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won