Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 450/2023

Case between A M Kuttappan vs A K Vishnu et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-11-12
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

A M Kuttappan filed a suit against A K Vishnu and Aishwarya Vishnu. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed due to the plaintiff's absence of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as not pressed due to the plaintiff not being represented.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as not pressed due to the plaintiff not being represented.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not press the suit and was absent from representation.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not press the suit and was absent from representation.
Supporting Evidence
The court noted the absence of the plaintiff's representation leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiff filed not press memo. Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
A M Kuttappan
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
A K Vishnu
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aishwarya Vishnu
Party Age
25
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajagopalan A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M N Manmadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Viswanath Salish
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Prabhu Muralikrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P A Martin Roy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Plaintiff filed not press memo. Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between A M Kuttappan vs A K Vishnu et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between A M Kuttappan vs A K Vishnu et al regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won