Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.1915/2023

Case between M. Krishnakumari Amma et al vs Siji.S @ Aswathy et al regarding rejection of plaint

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri.Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-06-21
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs consist of M. Krishnakumari Amma, Swapna Rajendrakurup, and Sneha Rajendrakurup. They filed a suit against the defendants Siji.S @ Aswathy, Sudharsanakurup, and Sujatha, which was ultimately rejected by the court due to non-payment of court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to the non-remittance of the required court fees by the plaintiffs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the non-remittance of the required court fees by the plaintiffs.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure due to non-payment of court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure due to non-payment of court fees.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure due to non-remittance of the balance court fee.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the plaint is rejected under Order V11 Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M. Krishnakumari Amma
Party Age
68
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Swapna Rajendrakurup
Party Age
44
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sneha Rajendrakurup
Party Age
43
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Siji.S @ Aswathy
Party Age
32
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sudharsanakurup
Party Age
68
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sujatha
Party Age
64
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V.N. Gopalakrishnan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Gopika.G
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court delivered the judgment which rejected the plaint.
Reference:
null

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M. Krishnakumari Amma et al vs Siji.S @ Aswathy et al regarding rejection of plaint
Case Code Year
Case between M. Krishnakumari Amma et al vs Siji.S @ Aswathy et al regarding rejection of plaint

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won