Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1018/2016

Case between M K Rajan Menon et al vs R Raveendranathan et al regarding evidence submission

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-08-12
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves M K Rajan Menon and his son Kishan Raj as plaintiffs, seeking to challenge the petition by defendants R Raveendranathan and others regarding evidence submission. The plaintiffs argue that the second plaintiff has the right to present evidence pertaining to his exclusive knowledge.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition to close the evidence of the second plaintiff, stating he has the right to present evidence related to his personal knowledge.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The second plaintiff has a right to adduce evidence on matters exclusively known to him.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M K Rajan Menon (61 years) Managalassery House, Edappally, Ernakulam Kishan Raj (29 years) Managalassery House, Edappally, Ernakulam

Defendants

R Raveendranathan (Age not specified years) Flat No. 2D, Skyline Amity Park, Edappally North Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District Rajalakshmi (Age not specified years) Flat No. 2D, Skyline Amity Park, Edappally North Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District Kavitha Raveendran (Age not specified years) Flat No. 2D, Skyline Amity Park, Edappally North Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases