Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 7 5 1 / 202 5

Case between M K Chandran vs M/s Sparkling Kay Kay Ventures Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding settlement of suit

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-08-26
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M K Chandran, filed a suit against M/s Sparkling Kay Kay Ventures Pvt. Ltd. and K K Habeeb. The matter has been settled between the parties, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court acknowledged that the parties have settled the matter and thus dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M K Chandran (73 years) Flat No. 301, C C No. XL 1/907, D2, Sui Palace, Chittoor Road, Pullepady P O, Kovilvattom Desom, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 035

Defendants

M/s Sparkling Kay Kay Ventures Pvt. Ltd. (Age not specified years) Formerly having office at Shop No. 78, NGO Quarters, Municipal Shopping Complex Thrikkakara, Ernakulam, Pin- 682 021. And now having address at Kisna Diamond and Gold, Ground Floor, Kumarapilla Estate, Near M G Road Metro Station, Kochi – 682 035, Ernakulam K K Habeeb (55 years) Kizhakkekara House, Kakkanad P O, Pin- 682 030, Ernakulam

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed as not pressed due to settlement between parties.
Evidence:
Counsel for plaintiff filed not press memo stating that matter settled between parties. Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases