Case Summary
Complainant M. Ahamed Ismail accused Baiju of committing an offense under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act in a case refiled from S.T.452/2013 of J.F.C.M-1, Tirur.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Guilty verdict
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Final Judgment
No
The court acquitted the accused Baiju under section 257 Cr.P.C. in a case involving a complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
The accused is acquitted u/s. 257 Cr.P.C.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M. Ahamed Ismail
- Relation
- Son of Mayyeri Ibrahim Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Baiju
- Relation
- Son of pallieri Janaki Amma
Plaintiffs Documents
Petition filed under section 257 Cr.P.C.
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Sreekala Sudheesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adv. V Padmakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Criminal Case
Outcome:
Not Guilty
Description:
Acquittal under section 257 Cr.P.C.
Evidence:
The accused is acquitted u/s. 257 Cr.P.C.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between M. Ahamed Ismail vs Baiju regarding dishonoured cheque
Case Code Year
Case between M. Ahamed Ismail vs Baiju regarding dishonoured cheque
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case