Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 12/2023

Case between Lyda Udayan et al vs Jayakrishnan B. regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Lyda Udayan and Paresh A.S. filed a rent control petition against Jayakrishnan B. The petition was dismissed as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

In the light of above memo, petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lyda Udayan
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Paresh A.S.
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayakrishnan B.
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent Control Petition
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ajith Viswanathan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shibu Joseph
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Balram S.A.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.C. Xavier
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sidharth P. Sasi
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ganesh Bhat R.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Haira Solomon
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Fadil Fazil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Paul S. Manguzha
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Petition dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
In the light of above memo, petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Lyda Udayan et al vs Jayakrishnan B. regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Lyda Udayan et al vs Jayakrishnan B. regarding Rent Control Petition

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between V.K.Jayachandran vs Nisha M.V regarding petition under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown
Case between Liya George vs Sulaiman regarding Petition under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965
THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Robin Thomas Vaidyan vs RAHA Ayurveda Hospital et al regarding eviction
Court of the Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Unknown
Case between Mrs. Susan Jacob John @ Susan John & Dr. Maria Kuriakose vs Mr. Annekot Ramadasan Padmakumar regarding Petition filed under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala (Buildings Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965
The Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Munir Gul Mohammed Sait et al vs K.M. Abdulla et al regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown