Case Summary
The decree holders, represented by George Thomas, filed an execution petition. The court decided that the delivery is not required and closed the execution petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was heard, and the court ordered that the delivery is not required, leading to the closure of the petition.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The court on the same day passed the following: Hence, Execution petition is closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Lusy Thomas Ettaniyil
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sarika An Mathews
- Party Age
- 26
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sanitha Maria Mathews
- Party Age
- 26
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- John
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mariamma John
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Marteena John
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Melvin John
- Party Age
- 31
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K. R Sreenivasan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Cyriac James
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- T. C Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2021