Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 653/2024

Case between Lovely Jacob vs Joy George regarding dismissal for default.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-11-10
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Lovely Jacob filed a suit against Joy George. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff absent. Plaintiff initially represented during roll call. Not represented when the suit was taken up after roll call. No Proof Affidavit seen filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lovely Jacob
Party Age
66
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Joy George
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joseph Shylan T.M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aynosh Michael P.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rahib K.Y
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Saju N.A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Lekha G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Uma G Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aleesha M.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Flony P.J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anupama Radhakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and his counsel.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Lovely Jacob vs Joy George regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Lovely Jacob vs Joy George regarding dismissal for default.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won