Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 879/2019

Case between Lissy Thomas and Rani Jolly vs P.A. Jihas et al regarding suit dismissal.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-01-21
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involved plaintiffs Lissy Thomas and Rani Jolly against defendants P.A. Jihas and others. The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiffs not being represented and necessary parties being dismissed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiffs were not represented in court and necessary parties had already been dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiffs were not represented in court and necessary parties had already been dismissed.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs were not represented in court.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiffs were not represented in court.
Supporting Evidence
The court concluded that the plaintiffs were not represented, which led to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence entire suit cannot be proceeded with. Moreover, Plaintiff is not represented. As D6 and D7 stands dismissed, suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lissy Thomas
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rani Jolly
Party Age
53
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.A. Jihas
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Salin
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramlath
Party Age
54
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M. P Rexy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. Antony Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.G Cleetus
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Paul N.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The entire suit cannot be proceeded with due to the absence of the plaintiffs' representation and the dismissal of necessary parties.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed against necessary parties. Hence entire suit cannot be proceeded with. Moreover, Plaintiff is not represented.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Lissy Thomas and Rani Jolly vs P.A. Jihas et al regarding suit dismissal.
Case Code Year
Case between Lissy Thomas and Rani Jolly vs P.A. Jihas et al regarding suit dismissal.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won