Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1539/2005

Case between Lilly Geoge et al vs Ramla et al regarding settlement of suit

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-03-01
Duration
approximately-18 years 8 months
Case Closed
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Lilly Geoge and others, pursued a case against the defendants, Ramla and others. The matter was settled between the parties with a joint compromise.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in terms of compromise with no order as to costs. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of half the court fees paid.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of ½ court fees paid
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in terms of compromise with no order as to costs. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of half the court fees paid.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of compromise are lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of compromise are lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Satisfied that the terms of compromise are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit decreed in terms of compromise. Compromise and plan shall form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lilly Geoge
Party Age
43
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Leah Sara George
Party Age
19
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Linju George
Party Age
13
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramla
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohammed Ansari
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Peeyus.A. Kottam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arjun Benedict
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.A Abdul Jabbar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Joint compromise filed. Satisfied that the terms of compromise are lawful.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Lilly Geoge et al vs Ramla et al regarding settlement of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Lilly Geoge et al vs Ramla et al regarding settlement of suit

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 01/01/2005 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won