O.S. No.1539/2005

Case between Lilly Geoge et al vs Ramla et al regarding settlement of suit

Court

II Additional Munsiff Court

Judge

Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran

Order Date

2024-03-01

Duration

approximately-18 years 8 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)

Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Lilly Geoge and others, pursued a case against the defendants, Ramla and others. The matter was settled between the parties with a joint compromise.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The suit was decreed in terms of compromise with no order as to costs. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of half the court fees paid.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Refund of ½ court fees paid

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of compromise are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit decreed in terms of compromise. Compromise and plan shall form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Lilly Geoge (43 years) Cheruvillil House, Surabhi Nagar, MIG 93, Kakkanad.P.O. Leah Sara George (19 years) Cheruvillil House, Surabhi Nagar, MIG 93, Kakkanad.P.O. Linju George (13 years) Cheruvillil House, Surabhi Nagar, MIG 93, Kakkanad.P.O.

Defendants

Ramla (48 years) Manath House, Thrikkakara Century Lane, Kakkanad.P.O. Mohammed Ansari (Age not specified years) Killiyinkal House, Kakkanad.P.O.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Suit decreed in terms of compromise.

Evidence:

Joint compromise filed. Satisfied that the terms of compromise are lawful.