Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
E.P 28/2024

Case between Liji D. Jacob et al vs Varghese D. Jacob et al regarding execution of decree

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smt. Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-03-21
Duration
Case Code No.
28
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The decree holders are Liji D. Jacob, Mathew D. Jacob, Rachal Cheriyan, and Annamma Rajan. They sought execution of a decree against the judgment debtors, including the deceased Varghese D. Jacob and others.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court satisfied the execution petition as the delivery of the property was made to the petitioners. The execution petition was closed as satisfied.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court satisfied the execution petition as the delivery of the property was made to the petitioners. The execution petition was closed as satisfied.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Execution petition is satisfied as the delivery of the property with effect to petitioners. Hence Execution Petition is closed as satisfied.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Liji D. Jacob
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mathew D. Jacob
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rachal Cheriyan
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Annamma Rajan
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Varghese D. Jacob
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saramma Varghese
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dinu D. Jacob
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chinnu
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Decree Holder
Advocate Name
Raju Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Execution petition is satisfied as the delivery of the property with effect to petitioners.
Evidence:
Execution petition is satisfied as the delivery of the property with effect to petitioners.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
E.A.2/24 is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
E.A.2/24 is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
E.P
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Molly Mathew vs Saji Damodharan et al regarding execution of a decree.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between P.S Mohanan Nair vs Naziya Farook regarding Execution Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Suma Jayaprasad vs Shajimon C.G. regarding Execution Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Prakash T. vs Biju R. regarding execution petition.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Aasila et al vs P.K. Sambasivan regarding execution of decree.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won