Case Summary
Lijesh Puthanveettil is the plaintiff seeking the return of an advance amount paid to the defendants, Suresh and Geetha, relating to an agreement for the sale of a property. The defendants allegedly failed to register the property as per the agreement.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff entitled to realise ₹2,00,000 from defendants with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from date of suit till date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, entitling him to recover an amount of ₹2,00,000 with interest from the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the existence of a valid sale agreement for the property and the fact that the defendants failed to perform their part of the contract.
The plaintiff proved the existence of a valid sale agreement for the property and the fact that the defendants failed to perform their part of the contract.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved the existence of a valid sale agreement for the property and the fact that the defendants failed to perform their part of the contract.
The plaintiff proved the existence of a valid sale agreement for the property and the fact that the defendants failed to perform their part of the contract.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff is entitled to get the advance amount as sought for. The defendants could not bring out anything to show that there had been no agreement for sale dated 08.11.2021.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: aThe plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only) from the defendants with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6% from the date of decree till realisation of decree amount.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Lijesh Puthanveettil
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abheesh PV
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suresh
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Geetha
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Sale agreement entered into between Suresh and Lijesh PV dated 08.11.2021.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V Razal rahiman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jyoth R
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C Balachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- from the defendants with interest.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only) from the defendants with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Sale Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court used this document to establish that an agreement for sale was executed between the plaintiff and the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Lijesh Puthanveettil vs Suresh et al regarding return of advance amount.
Case Code Year
Case between Lijesh Puthanveettil vs Suresh et al regarding return of advance amount.