Case Summary
This case involves a petition filed by the 3rd defendant, T.P.Tomy, to be deleted from the party array in a civil suit concerning a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiffs are seeking to restrain the defendants from providing access to certain roads in the housing project.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition to delete the 3rd defendant from the party array was allowed as he was not found to be a necessary party to the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court determined that the 3rd defendant was not a necessary party to the suit and hence permitted the deletion.
The court determined that the 3rd defendant was not a necessary party to the suit and hence permitted the deletion.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court determined that the 3rd defendant was not a necessary party to the suit and hence permitted the deletion.
The court determined that the 3rd defendant was not a necessary party to the suit and hence permitted the deletion.
Supporting Evidence
The petition is allowed as the 3rd defendant is not a necessary or formal party in connection with the subject matter involved in the above suit.
Judgment Evidence:
As the Defendant No.3/petitioner is not found to be a necessary party to the suit, the petitioner is hereby delete as D3 from the party array.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Lekha Murali
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Neema A.M
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- N.Rajesh
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- C.P. Rajesh
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Santhosh V.S
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- T.P.Tomy
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Malleenathan M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- A.K. Jayaprakash
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Harikrishnan. R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petitioner is hereby deleted as D3 from the party array.
Evidence:
As the Defendant No.3/petitioner is not found to be a necessary party to the suit, the petitioner is hereby delete as D3 from the party array.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Lekha Murali et al vs T.P.Tomy regarding petition to delete party from suit
Case Code Year
Case between Lekha Murali et al vs T.P.Tomy regarding petition to delete party from suit