Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1061/2022

Case between Leelavathy Amma et al vs Santhosh et al regarding fixation of northern boundary and injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-11-25
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Leelavathy Amma and others, filed a suit for fixing the northern boundary of the plaint properties and for an injunction against the defendants from trespassing. The defendants countered with a claim for a permanent injunction to prevent the plaintiffs from interfering with their property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court recorded a compromise between the parties concerning the property boundary and issued specific orders related to the boundary and construction activities. The suit was decreed according to the terms of the compromise.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties voluntarily entered a lawful compromise, satisfying the court that the dispute was settled.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed as per terms of compromise.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Leelavathy Amma (68 years years) Vattekkattu House, Edappally North P O, AIMS P O, Pin - 682 041 Sajeevkumar (49 years years) Vattekkattu House, Edappally North P O, AIMS P O, Pin - 682 041 Sheena (47 years years) Vattekkattu House, Edappally North P O, AIMS P O, Pin - 682 041 Rajeev (45 years years) Vattekkattu House, Edappally North P O, AIMS P O, Pin - 682 041 Padmakumari (62 years years) Aswathy, Vadakke Cheruvaram Road, Maradu P O, Pin - 682 304

Defendants

Santhosh (55 years years) Krishna Kripa, Vidakuzha Kara, Thaikkattukara P O, Pin 683 106 Suresh (52 years years) Krishna Kripa, Vidakuzha Kara, Thaikkattukara P O, Pin 683 106

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Prohibitory injunction against the defendants from trespassing and committing waste.
Evidence:
This court is satisfied that dispute as to the subject matter of the suit has been settled between the parties.
Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Agreement by the plaintiffs not to obstruct defendants in construction.
Evidence:
The plaintiffs hereby agree that they will not cause any obstruction to the defendants in constructing the compound wall.
Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Agreement by the defendants not to trespass into the plaintiffs' properties.
Evidence:
The defendants hereby agree that they will not trespassing in to the plaint A and B schedule properties.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court refers to sketches prepared by the Surveyor showing the agreed boundary line.
Reference:
IA 2/24
Document Type: Compromise Terms
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
The terms of the compromise between the parties are recorded and approved by the court.
Reference:
IA 4/25

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases