Case Summary
Leelamma is the plaintiff in this case against Dhanalakshmi Bank Ltd. and several others regarding a legal dispute. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence, with no opportunity for trial.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Leelamma
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dhanalakshmi Bank Ltd. Kottayam Branch
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rahul Raveendran
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kuttappan
- Party Age
- 82
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Santhamma
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anishmon T K
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Saji Koduvathu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aji. R. Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2019