Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 613/2021

Case between Leelamma @ Vasumathi vs Smt. Baby et al regarding court fee payment

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-07-25
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Leelamma is the plaintiff against Smt. Baby and others concerning the payment of balance court fees for the suit. The court ruled on the case after the plaintiff appeared, while the defendants did not.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the balance court fee as directed. The judgment was pronounced in open court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court ruled in favor of the defendants due to non-compliance by the plaintiff regarding the court fee.

Judgment Evidence:

the suit is rejected for non payment of balance court fee.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Leelamma @ Vasumathi (77 years) Vallanadu House, Kaloor Desom, Kaloor P.O. Elamkulam Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District 682017

Defendants

Smt. Baby (71 years) Vallanatt House, Maradu Desom, Maradu P.O. Maradu Village, Kanayannoor Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin 682304 Mary Annie (53 years) Vallanatt House, Maradu Desom, Maradu P.O. Maradu Village, Kanayannoor Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin 680304 Mrs. Seena @ Elsie (51 years) Vallanatt House, Maradu Desom, Maradu P.O. Maradu Village, Kanayannoor Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin 682304

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit is rejected for non payment of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence suit is rejected for non payment of balance court fee.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2021 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases