Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 613/2021

Case between Leelamma @ Vasumathi vs Smt. Baby et al regarding court fee payment

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-07-25
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 07/25/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Leelamma is the plaintiff against Smt. Baby and others concerning the payment of balance court fees for the suit. The court ruled on the case after the plaintiff appeared, while the defendants did not.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the balance court fee as directed. The judgment was pronounced in open court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the balance court fee as directed. The judgment was pronounced in open court.
Key Reasoning:
The court ruled in favor of the defendants due to non-compliance by the plaintiff regarding the court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The court ruled in favor of the defendants due to non-compliance by the plaintiff regarding the court fee.
Supporting Evidence
it is seen that so far balance court fee has not been remitted inspite of specific direction given on 06.07.2024.

Judgment Evidence:

the suit is rejected for non payment of balance court fee.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Leelamma @ Vasumathi
Party Age
77
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smt. Baby
Party Age
71
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mary Annie
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mrs. Seena @ Elsie
Party Age
51
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V. Thulaseedhara Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.R. Milton
Appearance Type
Exparte

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit is rejected for non payment of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence suit is rejected for non payment of balance court fee.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Leelamma @ Vasumathi vs Smt. Baby et al regarding court fee payment
Case Code Year
Case between Leelamma @ Vasumathi vs Smt. Baby et al regarding court fee payment

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 07/25/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 07/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won