Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 295/2016

Case between Leela Mukundan.M.K vs Ramankutty regarding dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-11-13
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Leela Mukundan.M.K filed a suit against Ramankutty. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, and the defendant was also not represented.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and the defendant at the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff had no bona fides in her non-appearance.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Leela Mukundan.M.K (63 years years) D-2, Sai Mukundan, FACT Nagar, Mini Bye-pass road, Kanayannoor taluk, Thekkumbhagom village, Thripunithura, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 301

Defendants

Ramankutty (60 years years) Kailas house, Edakkattuvayal, Chethikkode P.O, Kanayannoor taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 315

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Medical Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The medical certificate was produced as evidence to support the plaintiff's absence due to health issues.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District, Kerala
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases