Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Leela, Kumari Sheela, and Jayalekshmi, filed a suit against the defendant Peerumohammed. The court rejected the plaint due to the non-remittance of balance court fees.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint has been rejected due to non-payment of the required court fees.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Leela
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kumari Sheela
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jayalekshmi
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Peerumohammed
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S.A.Sundar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Sindhu S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2024