Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 180/2021

Case between Leela et al vs Krishnan et al regarding a civil suit

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-02-28
Duration
approximately-3 years 6 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Leela and Mahesh Ravi, are involved in a civil suit against the defendants, which include Krishnan and Chandrika. The case centers around a compromise agreement that was presented in court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the suit and decreed it in terms of the compromise agreement presented by the plaintiffs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Decree in terms of the compromise agreement
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs presented a compromise agreement that was accepted by the court.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement. Compromise agreement filed along with IA 8/25 and the sketch filed along with it shall from part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Leela (67 years years) Chirayil house, Puthiyakavu, Thekkumbhagam village, Kanayannur taluk, Tripunithura P.O. Mahesh Ravi (40 years years) Chirayil house, Puthiyakavu, Thekkumbhagam village, Kanayannur Taluk, Tripunithura P.O.

Defendants

Krishnan @ Pavithran (68 years years) Kariyaparambil House, Puthiyakavu, Thekkumbhagam village, Kanayannur taluk, Tripunithura. Chandrika (65 years years) Kariyaparambil house, Puthiyakavu, Thekkumbhagam village, Kanayannur taluk, Tripunithura. Unnikrishnan (30 years years) Kariyapparambil house, Puthiyakavu, Thekkumbhagam village, Kanayannur taluk, Tripunithura. Divaya (33 years years) Kariyapparambil house, Puthiyakavu, Thekkumbhagam village, Kanayannur taluk.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.
Evidence:
IA 8/25 is allowed. Suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Compromise agreement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court allowed the IA and decreed the suit according to the terms of the compromise agreement.
Reference:
IA 8/25
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The sketch filed along with IA 8/25 is included as part of the decree.
Reference:
null

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 08/28/2021 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases