Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Leela and Mahesh Ravi, are involved in a civil suit against the defendants, which include Krishnan and Chandrika. The case centers around a compromise agreement that was presented in court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Decree in terms of the compromise agreement
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the suit and decreed it in terms of the compromise agreement presented by the plaintiffs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs presented a compromise agreement that was accepted by the court.
The plaintiffs presented a compromise agreement that was accepted by the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs presented a compromise agreement that was accepted by the court.
The plaintiffs presented a compromise agreement that was accepted by the court.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the compromise agreement was valid and allowed the suit accordingly.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement. Compromise agreement filed along with IA 8/25 and the sketch filed along with it shall from part of the decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Leela
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- W/o late C.N.Ravi
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mahesh Ravi
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o late C.N.Ravi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Krishnan @ Pavithran
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o late Kunju
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chandrika
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- W/o Krishnan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Unnikrishnan
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- S/o Krishnan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Divaya
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- W/o Prasad
Plaintiffs Documents
Compromise agreement filed along with IA 8/25
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Abraham P George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bejla Mary Bejoy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Johny Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- H.Ramanan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.
Evidence:
IA 8/25 is allowed. Suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Compromise agreement
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court allowed the IA and decreed the suit according to the terms of the compromise agreement.
Reference:
IA 8/25
Document Type:
Sketch
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The sketch filed along with IA 8/25 is included as part of the decree.
Reference:
null
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Leela et al vs Krishnan et al regarding a civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between Leela et al vs Krishnan et al regarding a civil suit
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement