Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 111/2023

Case between Lathikesh vs Cyril Rapheal et al regarding dismissal of suit for default

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-12-06
Duration
Case Closed
Fri, 12/06/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Lathikesh, filed a suit against defendants Cyril Rapheal and Arun. The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation. The court ordered the dismissal of the case for default.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation. The court ordered the dismissal of the case for default.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear or represent the case despite multiple opportunities.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not appear or represent the case despite multiple opportunities.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, not represented. No representation continuously from the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lathikesh
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Cyril Rapheal
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Arun
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.P.Santhosh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Suraj Krishna B.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Febin Raj
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Manoj Vasu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Deepa C
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Simi V.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to lack of representation from the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Lathikesh vs Cyril Rapheal et al regarding dismissal of suit for default
Case Code Year
Case between Lathikesh vs Cyril Rapheal et al regarding dismissal of suit for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Fri, 12/06/2024 - 12:00
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won