Case Summary
Lathika Ramachandran filed a suit against multiple defendants including the Union Bank of India. The case involved the plaintiff seeking to withdraw the suit, which was permitted by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the plaintiff to withdraw the suit under relevant legal provisions. The judgment was pronounced in open court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff was permitted to withdraw the suit as per the applicable legal provisions.
The plaintiff was permitted to withdraw the suit as per the applicable legal provisions.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
IA 5/24 allowed. IA 4/24 allowed. Permitted to withdraw the suit under Order 23 Rule 1 CPC.
Judgment Evidence:
Permitted to withdraw the suit under Order 23 Rule 1 CPC. Pronounced by me, in the open court on this the 21st day of March, 2024.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Lathika Ramachandran
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Board of Directors of the Union Bank of India
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Authorized Officer, Union Bank of India
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Board of Directors of the ECGC
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Manager/AGM, ECGC
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- State of Kerala
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shameel.N.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- C.Muralikrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Abraham George Jacob
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Raheena P.I
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- C.M Sunilkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Akshay.R.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Mathew.B.Kurian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sunil.N
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Neethu Lishba Alexander
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nikhil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.T Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Permitted to withdraw the suit under Order 23 Rule 1 CPC
Evidence:
IA 5/24 allowed. IA 4/24 allowed. Permitted to withdraw the suit under Order 23 Rule 1 CPC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Lathika Ramachandran vs The Board of Directors of the Union Bank of India regarding withdrawal of the suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Lathika Ramachandran vs The Board of Directors of the Union Bank of India regarding withdrawal of the suit.