Case Summary
Lathika Kumari.T filed a petition against S.K. Hari regarding permission for construction. The court heard both parties and made a ruling on the matter.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court permitted the defendants to proceed with construction while adhering to building regulations.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Both sides represented. Heard both Sides. Defendants are permitted to effect constructions without violating the building rules.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Lathika Kumari.T
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- S.K. Hari
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. E.Babu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Kallambalam.S. Sreekumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Defendants are permitted to effect constructions without violating the building rules.
Evidence:
Defendants are permitted to effect constructions without violating the building rules.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Lathika Kumari.T vs S.K. Hari regarding construction permissions.
Case Code Year
Case between Lathika Kumari.T vs S.K. Hari regarding construction permissions.