Case Summary
Latheef filed a complaint against Nasar alleging an offence under the Negotiable Instrument Act. The court found that the complainant did not present sufficient evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The accused is acquitted of the charges against him due to lack of evidence from the complainant.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant failed to present evidence despite multiple opportunities being given.
The complainant failed to present evidence despite multiple opportunities being given.
Why Defendant Won:
The complainant failed to present evidence despite multiple opportunities being given.
The complainant failed to present evidence despite multiple opportunities being given.
Supporting Evidence
Ample opportunities were already given to the complainant for adducing evidence that not turn up.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the accused is acquitted. u/s. 256(1) Cr.P.C.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Latheef
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nasar
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Dinesh Pookkayil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Majeed Kalappattil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Latheef vs Nasar regarding offence under N.I. Act
Case Code Year
Case between Latheef vs Nasar regarding offence under N.I. Act
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act