Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 166 of 2018

Case between Latha vs Saraswathi et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Rejani Thankappan
Order Date
2024-01-09
Duration
approximately-5 years
Case Closed
Tue, 01/09/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Latha is the plaintiff who brought the suit against multiple defendants including Saraswathi. The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff did not appear in court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff did not appear in court.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Defendant represented. Suit is dismissed for default.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed for default. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Latha
Party Age
48
Relation
Wife of Sivaraman
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saraswathi
Party Age
73
Relation
Wife of Narayanan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Indira
Party Age
58
Relation
D/o. Narayanan and wife of Venu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Leela
Party Age
54
Relation
D/o. Narayanan, Wife of Late Mani
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gopalakrishnan @ Kannan
Party Age
46
Relation
Son of Narayanan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sindhu
Party Age
42
Relation
Wife of Gopakumar
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jose Tom.C.Kandathil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C.Devanand
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Madhusoodanan.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sreekala.C
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jinoy Thankachan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ebeeta George
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aparna.P.Menon
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Latha vs Saraswathi et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Latha vs Saraswathi et al regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 01/09/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won