Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 945 /2021

Case between Latha Saseendhra Shenoy vs Maya Varma et al regarding jurisdiction of the suit

Court
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-10-23
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Latha Saseendhra Shenoy filed a suit against Maya Varma and others. The court found it did not have the pecuniary jurisdiction to try the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found it lacked jurisdiction to hear the case and returned the plaint for re-filing in the appropriate court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court determined it has no pecuniary jurisdiction to try the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint is returned Under Order 7 Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure to be presented before SubCourt, Ernakulam having jurisdiction.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Latha Saseendhra Shenoy (59 years years) Edavazhikkal Shankar Nivas, Elamakkara P O

Defendants

Maya Varma (58 years years) Vishnukripa, Near Kalikkotta Palace, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk Dileep Varma (65 years years) Vishnukripa, Near Kalikkotta Palace, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk D Suresh (55 years years) Pulinjimoottil House, Kadungamangalam Desom, Kureekkad Desom, Chottanikkara

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases