Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 945 /2021

Case between Latha Saseendhra Shenoy vs Maya Varma et al regarding jurisdiction of the suit

Court
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-10-23
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Latha Saseendhra Shenoy filed a suit against Maya Varma and others. The court found it did not have the pecuniary jurisdiction to try the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found it lacked jurisdiction to hear the case and returned the plaint for re-filing in the appropriate court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found it lacked jurisdiction to hear the case and returned the plaint for re-filing in the appropriate court.
Key Reasoning:
The court determined it has no pecuniary jurisdiction to try the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The court determined it has no pecuniary jurisdiction to try the suit.
Supporting Evidence
This court has found that this court has no pecuniary jurisdiction to try this suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint is returned Under Order 7 Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure to be presented before SubCourt, Ernakulam having jurisdiction.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Latha Saseendhra Shenoy
Party Age
59
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Maya Varma
Party Age
58
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dileep Varma
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
D Suresh
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dinesh R Shenoy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joseph George A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Soumya T S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M K Revi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M P Ashok Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P C Gopinath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Bindu Sreedhar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Asif N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Latha Saseendhra Shenoy vs Maya Varma et al regarding jurisdiction of the suit
Case Code Year
Case between Latha Saseendhra Shenoy vs Maya Varma et al regarding jurisdiction of the suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won