Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 454/2025

Case between Latha R vs Jerome PG regarding dismissal of suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-10-15
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Latha R filed a suit against Jerome PG. The case involves a dispute that resulted in the plaintiff's pleadings being struck off and the suit being dismissed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to comply with a previous order, resulting in the striking off of their pleadings.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to comply with a previous order, resulting in the striking off of their pleadings.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to comply with the order as directed.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to comply with prior court orders.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence as per the dictum laid down in 2024 (5) KLT 750, the pleadings of plaintiff are struck off. The suit is dismissed accordingly with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Latha R
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jerome PG
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nidhin Raj Vettikkadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anjala Nazrin Subair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anjo Francis
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Meera Nair IP
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sithara Shaji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vidhusmrithi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jeroma P.G.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed with costs.
Evidence:
Hence as per the dictum laid down in 2024 (5) KLT 750, the pleadings of plaintiff are struck off. The suit is dismissed accordingly with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Latha R vs Jerome PG regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Latha R vs Jerome PG regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won