Case Summary
Plaintiffs Lasington Antony G and Philomina K J filed suit against defendants Anoop S S and Aswathy S seeking permanent prohibitory injunction due to obstruction of designated parking space.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants from obstructing and unauthorized parking in front of the plaint schedule car parking area. Defendants directed to pay costs of the suit to plaintiffs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Plaintiffs were granted a permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants from obstructing designated parking space.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs established their case through unchallenged documentary and oral evidence.
The plaintiffs established their case through unchallenged documentary and oral evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs established their case through unchallenged documentary and oral evidence.
The plaintiffs established their case through unchallenged documentary and oral evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The court was satisfied that the plaintiffs had established their case through unchallenged documentary and oral evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Plaintiffs were granted a permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants from obstructing and unauthorized parking in front of the plaint schedule car parking area. Defendants directed to pay costs of the suit to plaintiffs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Lasington Antony G
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o Gnanabhishekam
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Philomina K J @ Philomina Lasington
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- W/o Lasington Antony
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anoop S S
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o C Sudhakaran Nair
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aswathy S
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- W/o Anoop S S
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Sale deed no. 1372/1/2019 of SRO Thrikkakara, Certified copy of Sale deed no. 1528/1/2014 of SRO Thrikkakara, Photographs 4 Nos., Certificate Under Section 63 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restraining defendants from obstructing parking space
Evidence:
Unchallenged oral and documentary evidence supports decree
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Defendants directed to pay costs of the suit
Evidence:
Decree stated defendants must pay costs to plaintiffs
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Certified copy of Sale deed no. 1372/1/2019 of SRO Thrikkakara
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff title deed showing ownership rights
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Certified copy of Sale deed no. 1528/1/2014 of SRO Thrikkakara
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Prior deed regarding parking space transfer
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Photographs 4 Nos.
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Visual evidence of unauthorized parking
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Commission report and Photographs
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Determining dimensions of car parking area
Reference:
Ext.C1, C1(a), C1(b), C1(c), C1(d), C1(e)
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2024