Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1036/2018

Case between Lalitha V.R vs Suku regarding dismissal of suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-04-07
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiffs Lalitha V.R and Renju E.V against defendants Suku and Sumesh regarding a suit that was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence. The court concluded that the case could not proceed as no adjournment was requested.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was not present and did not provide evidence or request an adjournment.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was not present and did not provide evidence or request an adjournment.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to appear and lack of evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to appear and lack of evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The case was dismissed because the plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence in the listed case and no petition was filed to adjourn the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lalitha V.R
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Renju E.V
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suku
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sumesh
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Frijo K. Sundaram
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Hirusheekesan S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sandeep S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nidheesh P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The case was dismissed as the Plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is not present or ready for evidence in listed case and no petition is filed to adjourn the case. Dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Lalitha V.R vs Suku regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Lalitha V.R vs Suku regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won