Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No.818/2020

Case between Lakshmi vs Ramesh et al regarding suit dismissal.

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-12-06
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Lakshmi is the plaintiff, and Ramesh and others are the defendants. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and non-compliance with court directions.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation. The plaintiff failed to comply with court directions regarding the production of an amended plaint.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation. The plaintiff failed to comply with court directions regarding the production of an amended plaint.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff no representation. Defendant exparte. Amended plaint not produced. Plaintiff failed to comply with direction and is absent without representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lakshmi
Party Age
74
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramesh
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sasi
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhossh
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Boby
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sanoj
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sabu P Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sureshkumar C
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Manju Paul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anil Prasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C. N Sreekumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sinu G Nath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Tony George Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to comply with court directions.
Evidence:
Plaintiff no representation. Defendant exparte. Amended plaint not produced. Plaintiff failed to comply with direction and is absent with out representation. Suit dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Lakshmi vs Ramesh et al regarding suit dismissal.
Case Code Year
Case between Lakshmi vs Ramesh et al regarding suit dismissal.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won