Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 893/2020

Case between Laila Haneef vs Anoop C et al regarding recovery of money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-06-09
Duration
approximately-5 years 3 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Laila Haneef is the plaintiff seeking to recover arrears of rent from the defendants Anoop C and P.G.Cyril. The court found that the defendants were tenants who had failed to pay rent as agreed, leading to a dispute over the arrears and the claims made by both parties.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to prove damages as the claim was barred by law of limitation for a portion of the arrears. The court noted that the defendants had made payments that were acknowledged.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The claim for rent prior to October 2017 was barred by law of limitation, weakening the plaintiff's case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed. Parties shall bear their respective costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Laila Haneef (76 years years) Habisila, Chakkungal Road, Palarivattom, Cochin – 682 025.

Defendants

Anoop C (40 years years) Krishna Kripa, Tharayil road, Vellangallur – 680 662, Trissur District P.G.Cyril (60 years years) Panketh house, Ochamthuruth P.O, Ernakulam District – 682 508.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The plaintiff sought recovery of arrears of rent.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is dismissed. Parties shall bear their respective costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed between the plaintiff and defendant regarding the lease for the premises.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of the legal notice issued to the defendants demanding payment of arrears and eviction.
Reference:
Ext.A2(a)
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipt of the notice issued to the 2nd defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2(b)
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipt of the notice issued to the 1st defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2(c)
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reply notice issued to the plaintiff on behalf of the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Account statement of the plaintiff from Axis Bank for the specified period.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Account statement of plaintiff's son and daughter-in-law from Axis Bank for the specified period.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Account statement of plaintiff's son from Federal Bank for the specified period.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Account statement of the plaintiff from Axis Bank along with certification.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Account statement of plaintiff's son and daughter-in-law from Axis Bank along with certification.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Account statement of plaintiff's son from Federal Bank along with certification.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Email Communication
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Email communication along with certification.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Whatsapp Communication
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Screenshot of WhatsApp communication along with certification.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Lease Agreement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Photocopy of the lease agreement executed between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report filed by the Adv. Commissioner.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Wed, 02/26/2020 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases