Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 933/2021

Case between Laiju Raghavan vs P M Mohammed Basheer, Ahamed Azeeb Azad regarding dismissal of suit for default

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-11-07
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Laiju Raghavan filed a suit against P M Mohammed Basheer and Ahamed Azeeb Azad. The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff was absent and did not intend to proceed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was absent and did not provide evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and provided no evidence to support the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence satisfied that plaintiff does not intend to proceed with suit. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Laiju Raghavan (49 years years) Chadumattu House, FCRA 3A, Deshabhimani Road, Kaloor, Ernakulam - - 682 017.

Defendants

P M Mohammed Basheer (55 years years) Parayil Veedu, Thammanam, Ernakulam District. Ahamed Azeeb Azad (35 years years) Seethakulam House, Masjid Lane, Edappally - 682 024, Ernakulam District.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence satisfied that plaintiff does not intend to proceed with suit. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases