Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 933/2021

Case between Laiju Raghavan vs P M Mohammed Basheer, Ahamed Azeeb Azad regarding dismissal of suit for default

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-11-07
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Laiju Raghavan filed a suit against P M Mohammed Basheer and Ahamed Azeeb Azad. The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff was absent and did not intend to proceed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was absent and did not provide evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was absent and did not provide evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and provided no evidence to support the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and provided no evidence to support the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent no representation. No Proof affidavit seen filed so far, nor plaintiff is present for evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence satisfied that plaintiff does not intend to proceed with suit. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Laiju Raghavan
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P M Mohammed Basheer
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ahamed Azeeb Azad
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P Umasankar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Preethy G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M Gopikrishnan Nambiar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Joson Manavalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Dominic Antony
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Namitha Neethu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence satisfied that plaintiff does not intend to proceed with suit. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Laiju Raghavan vs P M Mohammed Basheer, Ahamed Azeeb Azad regarding dismissal of suit for default
Case Code Year
Case between Laiju Raghavan vs P M Mohammed Basheer, Ahamed Azeeb Azad regarding dismissal of suit for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won