Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No. 40 / 2021

Case between K.V.Saramma et al vs K.M.Marykutty et al regarding balance court fee not paid.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Judge
Smt. Sirsha N A
Order Date
2024-09-02
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including K.V.Saramma and others, filed a suit for which the balance court fee was not paid. Consequently, the court rejected the plaint under section order 7 rule 11 of the CPC.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to unpaid balance court fees.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to unpaid balance court fees.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Balance Court Fee not paid. Plaint rejected under section order 7 rule 11 of CPC.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.V.Saramma
Party Age
70
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Princy K Varghese
Party Age
39
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Eldho Mathew Varghese
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rani Varghese.K
Party Age
43
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.M.Marykutty
Party Age
72
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.M.Saramma
Party Age
78
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mathew P Paul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Soumya Kumari T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C.R.Vinodkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaint rejected due to balance court fee not paid
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not paid. Plaint rejected under section order 7 rule 11 of CPC.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.V.Saramma et al vs K.M.Marykutty et al regarding balance court fee not paid.
Case Code Year
Case between K.V.Saramma et al vs K.M.Marykutty et al regarding balance court fee not paid.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 09/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Komalvalliyamma vs Meera et al regarding partition
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between P.M.Gopalakrishnan Nair et al vs Adv.P.R.Rajan et al regarding declaration of easement right of way and injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Anie Ittan W/o Ittan et al vs Kurian S/o Joseph regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The Court of the Munsiff Kolenchery
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shibi Baby W/o Baby Joseph vs George S/o Paulose regarding declaration and injunction
THE MUNSIFF AT KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shibi Baby, W/o Baby Joseph et al vs George S/o Paulose regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won