Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1857/2001

Case between K.V.Peethambaran vs Kathreena Baruva et al regarding Judicial Settlement

Court
COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-07-25
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K.V.Peethambaran filed a suit against Kathreena Baruva and Simon Baruva regarding a Judicial Settlement. The case has been settled through a compromise agreement, which has been deemed lawful.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court recognized that both parties had settled the matter through a compromise agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court recognized that both parties had settled the matter through a compromise agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The matter was settled through a lawful compromise agreement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The matter was settled through a lawful compromise agreement.
Supporting Evidence
The terms of the compromise agreement seen to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement. Compromise agreement shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.V.Peethambaran
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o late Velayudhan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kathreena Baruva
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o late Manuel Baruva
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Simon Baruva
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o late Manuel Baruva
Plaintiffs Documents
Compromise agreement
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.K.Ravisankar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.Gopakumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A.T.AnilKumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.A.Joseph
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Hence suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.V.Peethambaran vs Kathreena Baruva et al regarding Judicial Settlement
Case Code Year
Case between K.V.Peethambaran vs Kathreena Baruva et al regarding Judicial Settlement

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won