Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 937/2017

Case between K.Vilasini alias Vilasini Sethumadhavan et al vs Smt.Sukumari et al regarding appointment of an Advocate Commissioner

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-11-20
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, K.Vilasini and Ashok Sethumadhavan, are involved in a dispute with the defendants, Smt.Sukumari and M.N.Subramanian, over the appointment of an advocate commissioner for measurement of property. The plaintiffs argue that the case is for injunction and that property measurement is unnecessary.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for appointment of an advocate commissioner to measure the properties in question. This is seen as necessary for the proper adjudication of the case.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Appointment of Advocate Raneesha Rajkumar as advocate commissioner.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for appointment of an advocate commissioner to measure the properties in question. This is seen as necessary for the proper adjudication of the case.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found a genuine need for identity of the properties through measurement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found a genuine need for identity of the properties through measurement.
Supporting Evidence
The matters sought for are highly necessary for proper adjudication of real controversy between the properties.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed. Advocate Raneesha Rajkumar is appointed as advocate commissioner.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.Vilasini alias Vilasini Sethumadhavan
Party Age
71
Relation
Wife of
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ashok Sethumadhavan
Party Age
45
Relation
Son of
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smt.Sukumari
Party Age
72
Relation
Wife of
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M.N.Subramanian
Party Age
81
Relation
Son of
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.N. Sreekumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Manju Paul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sabu P. Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anil Prasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joseph Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rajagopalan A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.N. Manmadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shyama A.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Appointment of an advocate commissioner for measurement of the suit properties and counter claim schedule properties.
Evidence:
the petition is to be allowed since the matters sought for are highly necessary for proper adjudication of real controversy between the properties

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.Vilasini alias Vilasini Sethumadhavan et al vs Smt.Sukumari et al regarding appointment of an Advocate Commissioner
Case Code Year
Case between K.Vilasini alias Vilasini Sethumadhavan et al vs Smt.Sukumari et al regarding appointment of an Advocate Commissioner

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won