Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 25 OF 2017

Case between Kuttiyil Pathummakutty vs Maliyekkal Raveendran regarding eviction of tenant

Court
THE COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.SUSHAMA.P.
Order Date
2019-05-30
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kuttiyil Pathummakutty seeks eviction of Maliyekkal Raveendran from a shop room. The petitioner claims she needs it for her sons to start a business after losing their jobs abroad.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted the petitioner's request for eviction, stating the need for the shop room is bona fide. The respondent was ordered to vacate the premises within two months.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Vacant possession of the shop room to the petitioner and payment of costs.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner's need for the shop room was established as genuine and bona fide.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result petition is allowed as follows; I. Directing the respondent herein to give vacant possession of the petition schedule shop rooms to the petitioner within 2 months from the date of this order under 11(3) of the Act.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kuttiyil Pathummakutty (83 years years) Mangala veettil, Pookkayil Bazar.P.O., Thrikkandiyur amsom Kumaramangalam desom, Tirur Taluk.

Defendants

Maliyekkal Raveendran (56 years years) Opposite KSEB Sub Station, Pookkayil, Tirur. Pin 676 107. Residing at Keraladheeswarapuram amsom desom, Tirur Taluk.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Vacant possession of the shop rooms is granted to the petitioner.
Evidence:
Hence the petitioner is entitled to get vacant possession of the shop rooms from the tenants under section 11(3) of the Act.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to pay the costs of the petition to the petitioner.
Evidence:
The respondent is directed to pay the costs of the petition to the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document served to notify the respondent to vacate the shop room.
Reference:
Ext.A1(a)
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided as evidence of sending the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A1(b)
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Served as proof that the lawyer notice was received.
Reference:
Ext.A1(c)
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Submitted to inform the court about the conditions of the premises.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Provided a detailed plan of the premises relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.C2

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases