Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 110/2024

Case between Kunju Muhammed et al vs T.Ansari Jaffer et al regarding Rent control petition

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2024-12-17
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a rent control petition filed by Kunju Muhammed and Abdul Razak against T.Ansari Jaffer and Kala K. Dayanandan. The petition was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's continuous absence and lack of interest in prosecution.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the rent control petition for default due to the petitioner's continuous absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the rent control petition for default due to the petitioner's continuous absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner showed lack of interest in prosecuting the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner showed lack of interest in prosecuting the case.
Supporting Evidence
Petitioner continuously absent, inspite of specific direction for appearance.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, rent control petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kunju Muhammed
Party Age
76
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Razak. P.K.
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T.Ansari Jaffer
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kala K. Dayanandan
Party Age
42
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A. A. Jaleel
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ajmal Jabbar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Rent control petition dismissed for default.
Evidence:
petitioner not interested to prosecute further. Hence, rent control petition is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kunju Muhammed et al vs T.Ansari Jaffer et al regarding Rent control petition
Case Code Year
Case between Kunju Muhammed et al vs T.Ansari Jaffer et al regarding Rent control petition

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between V.K.Jayachandran vs Nisha M.V regarding petition under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown
Case between Liya George vs Sulaiman regarding Petition under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965
THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Robin Thomas Vaidyan vs RAHA Ayurveda Hospital et al regarding eviction
Court of the Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Unknown
Case between Mrs. Susan Jacob John @ Susan John & Dr. Maria Kuriakose vs Mr. Annekot Ramadasan Padmakumar regarding Petition filed under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala (Buildings Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965
The Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Munir Gul Mohammed Sait et al vs K.M. Abdulla et al regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown