Case Summary
This case involves Kunjappan as the plaintiff and multiple defendants including Rosely, Baby, and Sherly. The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation in court.
Key Reasoning:
The judgment was made because the plaintiff failed to appear and take necessary steps despite multiple opportunities.
The judgment was made because the plaintiff failed to appear and take necessary steps despite multiple opportunities.
Why Defendant Won:
The judgment was made because the plaintiff failed to appear and take necessary steps despite multiple opportunities.
The judgment was made because the plaintiff failed to appear and take necessary steps despite multiple opportunities.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent continuously. No representation and absent. Multiple opportunities been afforded. No steps seen taken as ordered.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kunjappan
- Party Age
- 79
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rosely
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Baby
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sherly
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Joy
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Varghese
- Party Age
- 85
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- George Thomas Ollukkaran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.S.Sajeevkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Laji Sam Zachariah
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Bismi T.A
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and no representation.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kunjappan vs Rosely et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Kunjappan vs Rosely et al regarding dismissal for default.