Execution Petition No.1 of 2015

Case between Kuniyill Ismail vs Poochengal Pathummakkutty et al regarding execution of decree

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

Smt. Vincy.T.V.

Order Date

2016-12-14

Duration

Case Closed

Wed, 12/14/2016 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner filed an execution petition under Order 21 Rule 35 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which was dismissed as the petitioner was absent, and respondents did not appear.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Execution Petition Dismissed

Case Type

Execution Petition

Final Judgment

The Execution Petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed as the petitioner was absent.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Why Defendant Won:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence EP is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Kuniyill Ismail
Party Age: 35
Relation: S/o of Kunhimuhammed Haji

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Poochengal Pathummakkutty
Party Age: 62
Relation: D/o. Muhammed Kutty @ Kunhapputty

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sulaiman
Party Age: 40
Relation: Child of Muhammed Kutty @ Kunhapputty

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Adbulla
Party Age: 49
Relation: Child of Muhammed Kutty @ Kunhapputty

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sainaba
Party Age: 43

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Rukhiya
Party Age: 36

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Maimoona
Party Age: 41

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Annachampalli Kunhimoiodeen @ Kunhu
Party Age: 66
Relation: S/o. Moideenkutty @ Moideen Haji

Plaintiffs Documents

Not mentioned

Defendants Documents

Not mentioned

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Execution Petition Dismissal

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Petitioner's execution petition was dismissed.

Evidence: