Case Summary
Kuniyil Ismail, as the decree holder, filed a petition seeking relief which was ultimately dismissed by the court with liberty to file a proper petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition seeking relief was dismissed with liberty to file a proper petition by the court.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Heard The relief sought in the petition is not maintainable. Hence the petition is dismissed with liberty to file proper petition.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kuniyil Ismail
- Party Age
- 34
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Poochengal Pathummakkutty
- Party Age
- 61
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sulaiman
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdulla
- Party Age
- 49
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sainaba
- Party Age
- 43
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rukhiya
- Party Age
- 36
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mymoona
- Party Age
- 41
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Annachamballi Kunhimoideen alias Kunhu
- Party Age
- 65
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.K.Moosakutty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate
- Appearance Type
- Unknown
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Unknown
Outcome:
Not Granted
Description:
Relief sought was dismissed
Evidence:
Heard The relief sought in the petition is not maintainable. Hence the petition is dismissed with liberty to file proper petition.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2013