Case Summary
Three plaintiffs filed a case against the defendant which was eventually dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Applicable
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kunhipathumma
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- P1
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Faizal
- Relation
- P2
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Habeeb
- Relation
- P3
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saidali Haji
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V.Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate appearing for Saidali Haji
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Settlement and Mediation
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2014