Case Summary
The complaint alleged commission of offense punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The accused was acquitted as the complainant was continuously absent before the Court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Acquittal
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Final Judgment
No
The accused was acquitted under Section 256(1) of Cr.P.C.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned
Judgment Evidence:
At this juncture, the accused is acquitted u/s 256 (1) Cr.P.C. Bail bond stands canceled he is set at liberty.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kunhimuhammed
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed Shafi
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Nil
Defendants Documents
Nil
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv. T. Ramgopal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Suresh. A. Alingal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Acquittal
Outcome:
Not Guilty
Description:
Accused is acquitted under Section 256(1) of Cr.P.C.
Evidence:
Accused is acquitted u/s 256 (1) Cr.P.C.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Kunhimuhammed vs Muhammed Shafi regarding dishonour of cheque
Case Code Year
Case between Kunhimuhammed vs Muhammed Shafi regarding dishonour of cheque
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour