Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 179/2024

Case between Kumari vs Aparnna R. Menon regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-06-18
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kumari, a 73-year-old woman, filed a rent control petition against Aparnna R. Menon, a 33-year-old tenant. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed based on an agreement reached in mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court accepted a memo from the petitioner stating that they are not pressing the petition, leading to its dismissal.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted a memo from the petitioner stating that they are not pressing the petition, leading to its dismissal.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

The rent control petition is dismissed not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kumari
Party Age
73
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aparnna R. Menon
Party Age
33
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
D.M.Sajeevan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Asmi Sajeevan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Basil Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sanjana Sara Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Annie Ninan John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arya A.R.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed as per the terms of mediation report.
Evidence:
the rent control petition is to be dismissed as ‘not pressed’. Today learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo stating that, as per the terms of mediation report, he is not pressing this rent control petition.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kumari vs Aparnna R. Menon regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Kumari vs Aparnna R. Menon regarding Rent Control Petition

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between V.K.Jayachandran vs Nisha M.V regarding petition under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown
Case between Liya George vs Sulaiman regarding Petition under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965
THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Robin Thomas Vaidyan vs RAHA Ayurveda Hospital et al regarding eviction
Court of the Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Unknown
Case between Mrs. Susan Jacob John @ Susan John & Dr. Maria Kuriakose vs Mr. Annekot Ramadasan Padmakumar regarding Petition filed under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala (Buildings Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965
The Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Munir Gul Mohammed Sait et al vs K.M. Abdulla et al regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown