Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 179/2024

Case between Kumari vs Aparnna R. Menon regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-06-18
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kumari, a 73-year-old woman, filed a rent control petition against Aparnna R. Menon, a 33-year-old tenant. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed based on an agreement reached in mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court accepted a memo from the petitioner stating that they are not pressing the petition, leading to its dismissal.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

The rent control petition is dismissed not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kumari (73 years) Snehasree, Maradu.P.O, Pin-682304, Maradu Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District

Defendants

Aparnna R. Menon (33 years) Kunduvelil House, Maradu P.O, Pin-682304, Ernakulam District

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed as per the terms of mediation report.
Evidence:
the rent control petition is to be dismissed as ‘not pressed’. Today learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo stating that, as per the terms of mediation report, he is not pressing this rent control petition.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases