Case Summary
Kumari K, the plaintiff, seeks a final decree for partition of property following a preliminary decree issued in 2011. The case involves the division of a joint property among the parties, all of whom are legal heirs of the deceased owners.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition of property as per the final decree
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the commission report, allowing the partition of the property as per the preliminary decree. Each party received a designated share in the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The partition was carried out equitably as per the preliminary decree as evidenced by the commission report.
The partition was carried out equitably as per the preliminary decree as evidenced by the commission report.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The partition was carried out equitably as per the preliminary decree as evidenced by the commission report.
The partition was carried out equitably as per the preliminary decree as evidenced by the commission report.
Supporting Evidence
The commissioner has reported that the partition as per the commission report will ensure equitable division of the property as per the survey measurements and agreements reached during the process.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the final decree is passed as follows: Plot No.B shaded in orange colour in the Ext.C1(a) sketch admeasuring 0.74 Ares comprised in Resurvey No: 197/4 of Maradu Village, is allotted to petitioner as her share in the preliminary decree schedule property.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kumari K
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- W/o. Late K.N Ravi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K.A. Narayanan
- Relation
- S/o. late Appu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Lalitha
- Relation
- D/o. late Appu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K.A. Karthiayani
- Relation
- D/o. late Appu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Girija
- Relation
- W/o. late Raghavan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suresh
- Relation
- S/o. late Raghavan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Gireesh R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- A. T Anilkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sreenivasan K.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Final decree for partition and allotment of shares in the property.
Evidence:
Hence, the final decree is passed as follows: I.Plot No.A shaded in blue colour in the Ext.C1(a) sketch admeasuring 0.74 Ares comprised in Resurvey No: 197/4 of Maradu Village, is allotted to 4th to 6th respondents jointly towards their share in the preliminary decree schedule property.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The advocate commissioner has reported on the partition of the property as per the order.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Survey Sketch
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The sketch accompanies the commission report for the purpose of the partition.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kumari K vs K.A. Narayanan et al regarding partition of property
Case Code Year
Case between Kumari K vs K.A. Narayanan et al regarding partition of property