OS. No.253/2025

Case between Krishnaprasad. T et al vs Kerala Electricity Employee's Confederation INTUC et al regarding suit dismissal

Court

COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III

Judge

Smt. Sreelakshmi. C

Order Date

2025-10-09

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves the plaintiffs Krishnaprasad. T, Shibu. S.N, and Siyad. K.A, who brought the suit against the Kerala Electricity Employee's Confederation and its representatives. The court dismissed the suit due to absence of the plaintiffs and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiffs were absent and did not have any representation despite multiple notices.

Key Reasoning:

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs failed to appear or represent the case after multiple notices.

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence I find no reason to proceed with this suit. Suit stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Krishnaprasad. T
Party Age: 47
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Shibu. S.N
Party Age: 44
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Siyad. K.A
Party Age: 43
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kerala Electricity Employee's Confederation INTUC
Relation: represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: K.P.Dhanapalan
Party Age: 67
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Shahul Hameed
Party Age: 53
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. Kulathoor S.V. Premakumaran Nair
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. K. Murlidharan Nair
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

The suit stands dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence and lack of representation.

Evidence: