Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 191/2024

Case between Krishnan C.V vs Anoop P.K regarding attachment of property.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-03-19
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition filed by Krishnan C.V seeking to attach property owned by Anoop P.K. The petitioner claims that the respondent has failed to pay a promised amount and is now trying to sell the property, which could hinder the execution of a future decree in favor of the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition to attach the property conditionally for an amount of Rs. 3,66,000 and directed the respondent to furnish security.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Property is conditionally attached for an amount of Rs. 3,66,000/-
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The balance of convenience favors the petitioner, as allowing the petition avoids irreparable injury to him.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition stands allowed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Krishnan C.V (70 years years) Chittethuparambil House, Kaduval, Perumbavoor P.O., Parappuram Kara, Perumbavoor Village, Pin : 683542.

Defendants

Anoop P.K (37 years years) Aasarippady, First Floor, Near Karichatty Hotel, Edathala P.O, Pin : 683561.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Conditional attachment of property was sought to secure the amount owed to the petitioner.
Evidence:
Therefore, the petition stands allowed. Property is conditionally attached for an amount of Rs. 3,66,000/-.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document represents the agreement made by the defendant to pay an amount as per the arrangement, providing evidence of the debt owed.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of the Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the cheque issued by the defendant, which was returned due to insufficient funds, establishing the basis for the claim.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of the Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document corroborates the return of the cheque and is relevant to the plaintiff's claim for recovery of the amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Copy of the Partition Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document was produced by the respondent to support their claim of a prior agreement and the execution of a partition deed.
Reference:
Ext.B1

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases