Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.306/2017

Case between Krishnamma.P et al vs Girija.S et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-02-06
Duration
approximately-7 years 9 months
Case Code No.
306
Case Closed
Thu, 02/06/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Krishnamma.P and Sreekumary.K, brought a suit against the defendants, Girija.S, Divya.G, Aji.B, Preetha @ Pinky, and Renjith Kumar.S. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiffs not being ready for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court heard the case but found that the plaintiffs were not ready for evidence. Consequently, the suit was dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court heard the case but found that the plaintiffs were not ready for evidence. Consequently, the suit was dismissed.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs were not ready for evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiffs were not ready for evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff represented. Not ready for evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence dismissed. Pronounced in open court on this the 6th day of February 2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Krishnamma.P
Party Age
66
Relation
W/o late Sivanandan.N
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sreekumary.K
Party Age
42
Relation
W/o Renjith Kumar.S
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Girija.S
Party Age
49
Relation
M/o late Sreemathy
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Divya.G
Party Age
26
Relation
D/o Girija.S
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aji.B
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o Bharghavan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Preetha @ Pinky
Party Age
26
Relation
D/o Geetha
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Renjith kumar.S
Party Age
47
Relation
(Ex.Service Man)
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Bhoj Raj.S.J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Anish Unni.R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.G.Ajith kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Satheesh kumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff not ready for evidence.
Evidence:
Not ready for evidence. Suit stands included in list for trial today. Hence dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2017

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 05/01/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 02/06/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won