Case Summary
Krishnakumar.V filed a suit for injunction against Manikantakumar.V and others. The plaintiff was absent with no representation during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and no steps were taken to represent the case.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Step not taken. Plaintiff called absent no representation on his part. Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Krishnakumar.V
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manikantakumar.V
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Udayakumari Balachandran
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Karunakaran
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- W/o. Late
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Neena V.Karun
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- D/o Late
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sanjay V.Karun
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o Late
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Suresh Kumar.P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The suit filed by the plaintiff for an injunction was dismissed.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Step not taken. Plaintiff called absent no representation on his part. Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Krishnakumar.V vs Manikantakumar.V et al regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Krishnakumar.V vs Manikantakumar.V et al regarding Injunction